↓ Skip to main content

Dove Medical Press

Article Metrics

Exercise prescription for hospitalized people with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease and comorbidities: a synthesis of systematic reviews

Overview of attention for article published in International Journal of Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease, May 2012
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (88th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (94th percentile)

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source
twitter
9 tweeters
facebook
3 Facebook pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
22 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
299 Mendeley
Title
Exercise prescription for hospitalized people with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease and comorbidities: a synthesis of systematic reviews
Published in
International Journal of Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease, May 2012
DOI 10.2147/copd.s29750
Pubmed ID
Authors

Darlene Reid, Yamabayashi, Donna Goodridge, Chung, Hunt, Marciniuk, Brooks, Chen, Camp, Hoens

Abstract

The prescription of physical activity for hospitalized patients with acute exacerbation of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (AECOPD) can be complicated by the presence of comorbidities. The current research aimed to synthesize the relevant literature on the benefits of exercise for people with multimorbidities who experience an AECOPD, and ask: What are the parameters and outcomes of exercise in AECOPD and in conditions that are common comorbidities as reported by systematic reviews (SRs)?

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 9 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 299 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Canada 3 1%
United States 2 <1%
Brazil 2 <1%
South Africa 1 <1%
Sweden 1 <1%
France 1 <1%
Mexico 1 <1%
Japan 1 <1%
Portugal 1 <1%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 286 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 47 16%
Student > Bachelor 46 15%
Student > Ph. D. Student 38 13%
Researcher 34 11%
Student > Postgraduate 19 6%
Other 65 22%
Unknown 50 17%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 115 38%
Nursing and Health Professions 35 12%
Sports and Recreations 33 11%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 17 6%
Social Sciences 14 5%
Other 22 7%
Unknown 63 21%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 11. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 02 August 2016.
All research outputs
#2,156,093
of 17,960,381 outputs
Outputs from International Journal of Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease
#264
of 2,018 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#15,473
of 136,108 outputs
Outputs of similar age from International Journal of Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease
#3
of 34 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 17,960,381 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 87th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,018 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.9. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 136,108 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 34 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.