↓ Skip to main content

Dove Medical Press

Article Metrics

Implications and reflections on the 2010 Supreme Court ruling on Canada’s AHR Act

Overview of attention for article published in International Journal of Women's Health, July 2012
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age

Mentioned by

twitter
3 tweeters

Readers on

mendeley
5 Mendeley
Title
Implications and reflections on the 2010 Supreme Court ruling on Canada’s AHR Act
Published in
International Journal of Women's Health, July 2012
DOI 10.2147/ijwh.s27145
Pubmed ID
Authors

Raywat Deonandan, Tarun Rahman

Abstract

In December, 2010, Canada's 6 year old Assisted Human Reproduction Act was successfully challenged in the Supreme Court of Canada. There may be important implications for public health and the evolution of reproductive technologies in this country.

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 5 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 5 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Other 1 20%
Student > Ph. D. Student 1 20%
Student > Bachelor 1 20%
Researcher 1 20%
Student > Master 1 20%
Other 0 0%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Social Sciences 2 40%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1 20%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 1 20%
Unknown 1 20%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 06 February 2012.
All research outputs
#2,324,827
of 4,506,762 outputs
Outputs from International Journal of Women's Health
#141
of 273 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#35,378
of 75,174 outputs
Outputs of similar age from International Journal of Women's Health
#22
of 35 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 4,506,762 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 34th percentile – i.e., 34% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 273 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.4. This one is in the 28th percentile – i.e., 28% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 75,174 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 38th percentile – i.e., 38% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 35 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 20th percentile – i.e., 20% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.