↓ Skip to main content

Dove Medical Press

Comparison of pain models to detect opioid-induced hyperalgesia.

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Pain Research, April 2012
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
27 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
53 Mendeley
Title
Comparison of pain models to detect opioid-induced hyperalgesia.
Published in
Journal of Pain Research, April 2012
DOI 10.2147/jpr.s27738
Pubmed ID
Authors

Krishnan S, Salter A, Sullivan T, Gentgall M, White J, Rolan P, Paul Rolan, Krishnan, Salter, Sullivan, White, Gentgall

Abstract

Chronic opioid therapy may be associated with hyperalgesia. Our objective was to determine if opioid-induced hyperalgesia detection sensitivity is dependent on the stimulus used to detect it.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 53 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Netherlands 1 2%
Unknown 52 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 11 21%
Researcher 9 17%
Student > Bachelor 7 13%
Other 6 11%
Student > Doctoral Student 4 8%
Other 10 19%
Unknown 6 11%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 19 36%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 9 17%
Psychology 7 13%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 2 4%
Nursing and Health Professions 2 4%
Other 6 11%
Unknown 8 15%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 20 June 2012.
All research outputs
#14,147,730
of 22,671,366 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Pain Research
#999
of 1,731 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#96,373
of 163,395 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Pain Research
#7
of 10 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,671,366 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 35th percentile – i.e., 35% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,731 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 13.9. This one is in the 38th percentile – i.e., 38% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 163,395 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 38th percentile – i.e., 38% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 10 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 3 of them.