↓ Skip to main content

Dove Medical Press

Article Metrics

Endothelial cell counts after Descemet’s stripping automated endothelial keratoplasty versus penetrating keratoplasty in Asian eyes

Overview of attention for article published in Clinical Ophthalmology, April 2012
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
1 tweeter

Citations

dimensions_citation
20 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
21 Mendeley
Title
Endothelial cell counts after Descemet’s stripping automated endothelial keratoplasty versus penetrating keratoplasty in Asian eyes
Published in
Clinical Ophthalmology, April 2012
DOI 10.2147/opth.s26343
Pubmed ID
Authors

Marcus Ang, Jod Mehta, Anshu, Wong, Htoon, Tan

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to compare endothelial cell counts after Descemet's stripping automated endothelial keratoplasty (DSAEK) and penetrating keratoplasty in Asian eyes.

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 tweeter who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 21 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Singapore 1 5%
Unknown 20 95%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 7 33%
Student > Ph. D. Student 3 14%
Other 2 10%
Student > Bachelor 2 10%
Professor 1 5%
Other 5 24%
Unknown 1 5%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 15 71%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1 5%
Nursing and Health Professions 1 5%
Unknown 4 19%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 03 April 2012.
All research outputs
#9,995,728
of 12,488,808 outputs
Outputs from Clinical Ophthalmology
#1,037
of 1,597 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#84,840
of 119,446 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Clinical Ophthalmology
#21
of 48 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 12,488,808 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,597 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.2. This one is in the 13th percentile – i.e., 13% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 119,446 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 14th percentile – i.e., 14% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 48 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 41st percentile – i.e., 41% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.