↓ Skip to main content

Dove Medical Press

Article Metrics

Retinal thickness after vitrectomy and internal limiting membrane peeling for macular hole and epiretinal membrane

Overview of attention for article published in Clinical Ophthalmology, May 2012
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
1 tweeter

Citations

dimensions_citation
35 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
30 Mendeley
Title
Retinal thickness after vitrectomy and internal limiting membrane peeling for macular hole and epiretinal membrane
Published in
Clinical Ophthalmology, May 2012
DOI 10.2147/opth.s30288
Pubmed ID
Authors

Kazuyuki Kumagai, Larson, Ogino, Hangai, Furukawa

Abstract

To determine the retinal thickness (RT), after vitrectomy with internal limiting membrane (ILM) peeling, for an idiopathic macular hole (MH) or an epiretinal membrane (ERM). Also, to investigate the effect of a dissociated optic nerve fiber layer (DONFL) appearance on RT.

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 tweeter who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 30 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
India 1 3%
Netherlands 1 3%
Unknown 28 93%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 6 20%
Researcher 6 20%
Student > Master 5 17%
Student > Bachelor 4 13%
Other 2 7%
Other 4 13%
Unknown 3 10%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 21 70%
Computer Science 1 3%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1 3%
Nursing and Health Professions 1 3%
Engineering 1 3%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 5 17%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 04 May 2012.
All research outputs
#9,995,728
of 12,488,808 outputs
Outputs from Clinical Ophthalmology
#1,037
of 1,597 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#84,840
of 119,446 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Clinical Ophthalmology
#21
of 48 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 12,488,808 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,597 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.2. This one is in the 12th percentile – i.e., 12% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 119,446 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 14th percentile – i.e., 14% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 48 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 41st percentile – i.e., 41% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.