↓ Skip to main content

Dove Medical Press

Article Metrics

Pharmacist counseling in a cohort of women with HIV and women at risk for HIV

Overview of attention for article published in Patient preference and adherence, June 2012
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
3 tweeters

Citations

dimensions_citation
7 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
29 Mendeley
Title
Pharmacist counseling in a cohort of women with HIV and women at risk for HIV
Published in
Patient preference and adherence, June 2012
DOI 10.2147/ppa.s30797
Pubmed ID
Authors

Jennifer Cocohoba, Althoff, Cohen, Hu, Cunningham, Sharma, Greenblatt

Abstract

Achieving high adherence to antiretroviral therapy for human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) is challenging due to various system-related, medication-related, and patient-related factors. Community pharmacists can help patients resolve many medication-related issues that lead to poor adherence. The purpose of this cross-sectional survey nested within the Women's Interagency HIV Study was to describe characteristics of women who had received pharmacist medication counseling within the previous 6 months. The secondary objective was to determine whether HIV-positive women who received pharmacist counseling had better treatment outcomes, including self-reported adherence, CD4(+) cell counts, and HIV-1 viral loads.

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 29 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Brazil 1 3%
Unknown 28 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Postgraduate 5 17%
Other 4 14%
Researcher 4 14%
Student > Ph. D. Student 3 10%
Student > Doctoral Student 3 10%
Other 7 24%
Unknown 3 10%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 15 52%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 3 10%
Nursing and Health Professions 2 7%
Psychology 2 7%
Unspecified 1 3%
Other 2 7%
Unknown 4 14%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 03 August 2012.
All research outputs
#7,551,726
of 12,522,829 outputs
Outputs from Patient preference and adherence
#572
of 1,052 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#62,919
of 119,845 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Patient preference and adherence
#20
of 31 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 12,522,829 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 37th percentile – i.e., 37% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,052 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.5. This one is in the 40th percentile – i.e., 40% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 119,845 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 31 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 35th percentile – i.e., 35% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.