| Title |
A systematic review of randomized controlled trials on curative and health enhancement effects of forest therapy
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Psychology Research and Behavior Management, July 2012
|
| DOI | 10.2147/prbm.s32402 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Hiroharu Kamioka, Kiichiro Tsutani, Yoshiteru Mutoh, Takuya Honda, Nobuyoshi Shiozawa, Shinpei Okada, Sang-Jun Park, Jun Kitayuguchi, Masamitsu Kamada, Hiroyasu Okuizumi, Shuichi Handa |
| Abstract |
To summarize the evidence for curative and health enhancement effects through forest therapy and to assess the quality of studies based on a review of randomized controlled trials (RCTs). |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Italy | 1 | 33% |
| Japan | 1 | 33% |
| Unknown | 1 | 33% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 2 | 67% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 33% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 92 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 92 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 14 | 15% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 12 | 13% |
| Researcher | 9 | 10% |
| Student > Bachelor | 8 | 9% |
| Professor | 7 | 8% |
| Other | 21 | 23% |
| Unknown | 21 | 23% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Psychology | 16 | 17% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 12 | 13% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 8 | 9% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 6 | 7% |
| Social Sciences | 5 | 5% |
| Other | 18 | 20% |
| Unknown | 27 | 29% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 7. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 29 April 2023.
All research outputs
#4,824,875
of 23,652,325 outputs
Outputs from Psychology Research and Behavior Management
#147
of 606 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#32,544
of 165,053 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Psychology Research and Behavior Management
#1
of 2 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,652,325 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 79th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 606 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.7. This one has done well, scoring higher than 75% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 165,053 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 80% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 2 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them