↓ Skip to main content

Dove Medical Press

Article Metrics

Can a feedback report and training session on medication counseling for general practitioners improve patient satisfaction with information on medicines?

Overview of attention for article published in Patient preference and adherence, March 2012
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
2 tweeters

Citations

dimensions_citation
10 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
20 Mendeley
Title
Can a feedback report and training session on medication counseling for general practitioners improve patient satisfaction with information on medicines?
Published in
Patient preference and adherence, March 2012
DOI 10.2147/ppa.s27378
Pubmed ID
Authors

Cornelia Mahler, Hermann, Jank, Haefeli, Szecsenyi

Abstract

Regular intake of medicines prevents hospitalization and improves treatment outcomes in patients with chronic diseases; however, requires good patient-physician communication. Yet, this communication is often insufficient and characterized by misunderstandings. This paper aimed to explore whether a training session on medication counseling for general practitioners (GPs) can improve patient satisfaction about information on medicines.

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 20 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 20 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 6 30%
Student > Master 4 20%
Student > Bachelor 3 15%
Lecturer > Senior Lecturer 1 5%
Librarian 1 5%
Other 2 10%
Unknown 3 15%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 7 35%
Arts and Humanities 2 10%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 2 10%
Psychology 2 10%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1 5%
Other 3 15%
Unknown 3 15%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 08 March 2012.
All research outputs
#7,474,612
of 12,522,829 outputs
Outputs from Patient preference and adherence
#560
of 1,052 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#61,858
of 119,846 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Patient preference and adherence
#20
of 32 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 12,522,829 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 39th percentile – i.e., 39% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,052 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.5. This one is in the 45th percentile – i.e., 45% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 119,846 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 47th percentile – i.e., 47% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 32 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 37th percentile – i.e., 37% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.