Title |
Comparison of timolol 0.5% + brimonidine 0.2% + dorzolamide 2% versus timolol 0.5% + brimonidine 0.2% in a Mexican population with primary open-angle glaucoma or ocular hypertension
|
---|---|
Published in |
Clinical Ophthalmology, July 2012
|
DOI | 10.2147/opth.s33578 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Leopoldo Martín Baiza Durán, Juan Francisco Llamas-Moreno, Clotilde Ayala-Barajas, Monica Gonzalez-Lomeli |
Abstract |
The purpose of this study was to evaluate the efficacy and safety of two fixed combinations, ie, timolol 0.5% + brimonidine 0.2% + dorzolamide 2% (TBD) versus timolol 0.5% + brimonidine 0.2% (TB) in patients with primary open-angle glaucoma or ocular hypertension. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Peru | 1 | 33% |
United States | 1 | 33% |
Unknown | 1 | 33% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 3 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 20 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 20 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Other | 4 | 20% |
Researcher | 3 | 15% |
Student > Master | 1 | 5% |
Student > Bachelor | 1 | 5% |
Professor > Associate Professor | 1 | 5% |
Other | 1 | 5% |
Unknown | 9 | 45% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 8 | 40% |
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 1 | 5% |
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 1 | 5% |
Computer Science | 1 | 5% |
Unknown | 9 | 45% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 15 November 2015.
All research outputs
#14,784,639
of 25,374,917 outputs
Outputs from Clinical Ophthalmology
#1,087
of 3,714 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#100,190
of 176,747 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Clinical Ophthalmology
#13
of 31 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,917 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 41st percentile – i.e., 41% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,714 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.9. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 70% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 176,747 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 42nd percentile – i.e., 42% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 31 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 54% of its contemporaries.