↓ Skip to main content

Dove Medical Press

Article Metrics

Clinical evaluation of XaraColl®, a bupivacaine-collagen implant, for postoperative analgesia in two multicenter, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled pilot studies

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Pain Research, June 2012
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (81st percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (75th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
1 tweeter
patent
2 patents

Citations

dimensions_citation
7 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
21 Mendeley
Title
Clinical evaluation of XaraColl®, a bupivacaine-collagen implant, for postoperative analgesia in two multicenter, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled pilot studies
Published in
Journal of Pain Research, June 2012
DOI 10.2147/jpr.s33453
Pubmed ID
Authors

Susan Cusack, Mark Jaros, Michael Kuss, Harold Minkowitz, Peter Winkle, Lisa Hemsen

Abstract

XaraColl(®), a collagen-based implant that delivers bupivacaine to the site of surgical trauma, is under development for postoperative analgesia. Because of differing patient attitudes to postoperative pain control and the inability to assess baseline pain, standard clinical methods for evaluating analgesic efficacy are compromised and justify application of novel integrated approaches.

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 tweeter who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 21 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 1 5%
Ireland 1 5%
Germany 1 5%
Unknown 18 86%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 4 19%
Professor 4 19%
Researcher 3 14%
Student > Ph. D. Student 2 10%
Student > Master 2 10%
Other 3 14%
Unknown 3 14%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 5 24%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 4 19%
Psychology 3 14%
Materials Science 2 10%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 1 5%
Other 2 10%
Unknown 4 19%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 7. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 28 January 2020.
All research outputs
#2,947,128
of 16,682,934 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Pain Research
#290
of 1,240 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#22,255
of 130,424 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Pain Research
#4
of 16 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 16,682,934 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 81st percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,240 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 13.5. This one has done well, scoring higher than 75% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 130,424 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 81% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 16 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 75% of its contemporaries.