Title |
Traumeel – an emerging option to nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs in the management of acute musculoskeletal injuries
|
---|---|
Published in |
International Journal of General Medicine, March 2011
|
DOI | 10.2147/ijgm.s16709 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Christian Schneider |
Abstract |
Musculoskeletal injuries are on the rise. First-line management of such injuries usually employs the RICE (rest, ice, compression, and elevation) approach to limit excessive inflammation. Nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) are also commonly used to limit inflammation and to control pain. Traumeel(®), a preparation with bioregulatory effects is also used to treat the symptoms associated with acute musculoskeletal injuries, including pain and swelling. Traumeel is a fixed combination of biological and mineral extracts, which aims to apply stimuli to multiple targets to restore normal functioning of regulatory mechanisms. This paper presents the accumulating evidence of Traumeel's action on the inflammatory process, and of its efficacy and tolerability in randomized trials, as well as observational and surveillance studies for the treatment of musculoskeletal injuries. Traumeel has shown comparable effectiveness to NSAIDs in terms of reducing symptoms of inflammation, accelerating recovery, and improving mobility, with a favorable safety profile. While continued research and development is ongoing to broaden the clinical evidence of Traumeel in acute musculoskeletal injury and to further establish its benefits, current information suggests that Traumeel may be considered as an anti-inflammatory agent that is at least as effective and appears to be better tolerated than NSAIDs. |
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United States | 6 | 17% |
Canada | 4 | 11% |
United Kingdom | 2 | 6% |
Switzerland | 2 | 6% |
Australia | 1 | 3% |
Spain | 1 | 3% |
United Arab Emirates | 1 | 3% |
Colombia | 1 | 3% |
Italy | 1 | 3% |
Other | 1 | 3% |
Unknown | 16 | 44% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 30 | 83% |
Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 5 | 14% |
Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 3% |
Mendeley readers
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Germany | 2 | 2% |
Colombia | 1 | <1% |
Australia | 1 | <1% |
Spain | 1 | <1% |
United States | 1 | <1% |
Unknown | 112 | 95% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Master | 22 | 19% |
Researcher | 19 | 16% |
Student > Bachelor | 10 | 8% |
Other | 8 | 7% |
Student > Postgraduate | 8 | 7% |
Other | 25 | 21% |
Unknown | 26 | 22% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 47 | 40% |
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 14 | 12% |
Nursing and Health Professions | 7 | 6% |
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 5 | 4% |
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 4 | 3% |
Other | 15 | 13% |
Unknown | 26 | 22% |