↓ Skip to main content

Dove Medical Press

New onset diabetes after transplantation (NODAT): an overview

Overview of attention for article published in Diabetes, Metabolic Syndrome and Obesity: Targets and Therapy, May 2011
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
189 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
228 Mendeley
Title
New onset diabetes after transplantation (NODAT): an overview
Published in
Diabetes, Metabolic Syndrome and Obesity: Targets and Therapy, May 2011
DOI 10.2147/dmso.s19027
Pubmed ID
Authors

Phuong-Thu T Pham, Phuong-Mai T Pham, Son V Pham, Phuong-Anh T Pham, Phuong-Chi T Pham

Abstract

Although renal transplantation ameliorates cardiovascular risk factors by restoring renal function, it introduces new cardiovascular risks including impaired glucose tolerance or diabetes mellitus, hypertension, and dyslipidemia that are derived, in part, from immunosuppressive medications such as calcineurin inhibitors, corticosteroids, or mammalian target of rapamycin inhibitors. New onset diabetes mellitus after transplantation (NODAT) is a serious and common complication following solid organ transplantation. NODAT has been reported to occur in 2% to 53% of all solid organ transplants. Kidney transplant recipients who develop NODAT have variably been reported to be at increased risk of fatal and nonfatal cardiovascular events and other adverse outcomes including infection, reduced patient survival, graft rejection, and accelerated graft loss compared with those who do not develop diabetes. Identification of high-risk patients and implementation of measures to reduce the development of NODAT may improve long-term patient and graft outcome. The following article presents an overview of the literature on the current diagnostic criteria for NODAT, its incidence after solid organ transplantation, suggested risk factors and potential pathogenic mechanisms. The impact of NODAT on patient and allograft outcomes and suggested guidelines for early identification and management of NODAT will also be discussed.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 228 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Italy 2 <1%
Portugal 1 <1%
Brazil 1 <1%
Costa Rica 1 <1%
Canada 1 <1%
Unknown 222 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Postgraduate 32 14%
Student > Bachelor 29 13%
Student > Master 29 13%
Researcher 24 11%
Student > Ph. D. Student 23 10%
Other 44 19%
Unknown 47 21%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 113 50%
Nursing and Health Professions 14 6%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 13 6%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 10 4%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 8 4%
Other 16 7%
Unknown 54 24%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 13 February 2019.
All research outputs
#17,408,360
of 25,540,105 outputs
Outputs from Diabetes, Metabolic Syndrome and Obesity: Targets and Therapy
#612
of 1,189 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#94,649
of 121,837 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Diabetes, Metabolic Syndrome and Obesity: Targets and Therapy
#7
of 9 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,540,105 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,189 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 9.6. This one is in the 33rd percentile – i.e., 33% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 121,837 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 13th percentile – i.e., 13% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 9 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 2 of them.