↓ Skip to main content

Dove Medical Press

The pathophysiology of bronchiectasis

Overview of attention for article published in International Journal of Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease, October 2009
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (70th percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (60th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users
patent
3 patents
facebook
2 Facebook pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
161 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
390 Mendeley
Title
The pathophysiology of bronchiectasis
Published in
International Journal of Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease, October 2009
DOI 10.2147/copd.s6133
Pubmed ID
Authors

Paul T King

Abstract

Bronchiectasis is defined by permanent and abnormal widening of the bronchi. This process occurs in the context of chronic airway infection and inflammation. It is usually diagnosed using computed tomography scanning to visualize the larger bronchi. Bronchiectasis is also characterized by mild to moderate airflow obstruction. This review will describe the pathophysiology of noncystic fibrosis bronchiectasis. Studies have demonstrated that the small airways in bronchiectasis are obstructed from an inflammatory infiltrate in the wall. As most of the bronchial tree is composed of small airways, the net effect is obstruction. The bronchial wall is typically thickened by an inflammatory infiltrate of lymphocytes and macrophages which may form lymphoid follicles. It has recently been demonstrated that patients with bronchiectasis have a progressive decline in lung function. There are a large number of etiologic risk factors associated with bronchiectasis. As there is generally a long-term retrospective history, it may be difficult to determine the exact role of such factors in the pathogenesis. Extremes of age and smoking/chronic obstructive pulmonary disease may be important considerations. There are a variety of different pathogens involved in bronchiectasis, but a common finding despite the presence of purulent sputum is failure to identify any pathogenic microorganisms. The bacterial flora appears to change with progression of disease.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 390 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 2 <1%
Australia 1 <1%
Mexico 1 <1%
Spain 1 <1%
United States 1 <1%
Unknown 384 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 86 22%
Student > Master 38 10%
Student > Postgraduate 31 8%
Student > Ph. D. Student 29 7%
Researcher 28 7%
Other 62 16%
Unknown 116 30%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 170 44%
Nursing and Health Professions 27 7%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 19 5%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 11 3%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 8 2%
Other 33 8%
Unknown 122 31%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 06 February 2024.
All research outputs
#6,754,462
of 25,374,917 outputs
Outputs from International Journal of Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease
#748
of 2,577 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#31,262
of 106,409 outputs
Outputs of similar age from International Journal of Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease
#2
of 5 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,917 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 73rd percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,577 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.5. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 70% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 106,409 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 70% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 5 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 3 of them.