↓ Skip to main content

Dove Medical Press

Article Metrics

Cognitive behavioral therapy for insomnia comorbid with COPD is feasible with preliminary evidence of positive sleep and fatigue effects

Overview of attention for article published in International Journal of Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease, November 2011
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
2 tweeters

Citations

dimensions_citation
55 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
170 Mendeley
Title
Cognitive behavioral therapy for insomnia comorbid with COPD is feasible with preliminary evidence of positive sleep and fatigue effects
Published in
International Journal of Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease, November 2011
DOI 10.2147/copd.s24858
Pubmed ID
Authors

Mary Kapella, Herdegen, Perlis, Shaver, Larson, Law, Carley

Abstract

Many people with COPD report difficulties falling asleep or staying asleep, insufficient sleep duration, or nonrestorative sleep. Cognitive behavioral therapy for insomnia (CBT-I) has proved effective not only in people with primary insomnia but also in people with insomnia comorbid with psychiatric and medical illness (eg, depression, cancer, and chronic pain). However, CBT-I has rarely been tested in those with COPD who have disease-related features that interfere with sleep and may lessen the effectiveness of such therapies. The purpose of this study was to determine the feasibility of applying a CBT-I intervention for people with COPD and to assess the impact of CBT-I on insomnia severity and sleep-related outcomes, fatigue, mood, and daytime functioning.

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 170 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 2 1%
Spain 1 <1%
India 1 <1%
Australia 1 <1%
Unknown 165 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 27 16%
Researcher 25 15%
Student > Bachelor 24 14%
Student > Master 23 14%
Student > Doctoral Student 16 9%
Other 36 21%
Unknown 19 11%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 49 29%
Medicine and Dentistry 35 21%
Nursing and Health Professions 33 19%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 7 4%
Social Sciences 6 4%
Other 15 9%
Unknown 25 15%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 02 December 2013.
All research outputs
#7,186,827
of 12,450,995 outputs
Outputs from International Journal of Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease
#839
of 1,517 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#59,727
of 120,269 outputs
Outputs of similar age from International Journal of Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease
#22
of 35 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 12,450,995 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 40th percentile – i.e., 40% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,517 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.0. This one is in the 40th percentile – i.e., 40% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 120,269 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 47th percentile – i.e., 47% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 35 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 31st percentile – i.e., 31% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.