↓ Skip to main content

Dove Medical Press

Treating nausea and vomiting in palliative care: a review

Overview of attention for article published in Clinical Interventions in Aging, September 2011
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (96th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (85th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
blogs
2 blogs
policy
2 policy sources
twitter
6 X users
wikipedia
5 Wikipedia pages
googleplus
1 Google+ user

Citations

dimensions_citation
138 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
395 Mendeley
Title
Treating nausea and vomiting in palliative care: a review
Published in
Clinical Interventions in Aging, September 2011
DOI 10.2147/cia.s13109
Pubmed ID
Authors

Paul Glare, Jeanna Miller, Tanya Nikolova, Roma Tickoo

Abstract

Nausea and vomiting are portrayed in the specialist palliative care literature as common and distressing symptoms affecting the majority of patients with advanced cancer and other life-limiting illnesses. However, recent surveys indicate that these symptoms may be less common and bothersome than has previously been reported. The standard palliative care approach to the assessment and treatment of nausea and vomiting is based on determining the cause and then relating this back to the "emetic pathway" before prescribing drugs such as dopamine antagonists, antihistamines, and anticholinergic agents which block neurotransmitters at different sites along the pathway. However, the evidence base for the effectiveness of this approach is meager, and may be in part because relevance of the neuropharmacology of the emetic pathway to palliative care patients is limited. Many palliative care patients are over the age of 65 years, making these agents difficult to use. Greater awareness of drug interactions and QT(c) prolongation are emerging concerns for all age groups. The selective serotonin receptor antagonists are the safest antiemetics, but are not used first-line in many countries because there is very little scientific rationale or clinical evidence to support their use outside the licensed indications. Cannabinoids may have an increasing role. Advances in interventional gastroenterology are increasing the options for nonpharmacological management. Despite these emerging issues, the approach to nausea and vomiting developed within palliative medicine over the past 40 years remains relevant. It advocates careful clinical evaluation of the symptom and the person suffering it, and an understanding of the clinical pharmacology of medicines that are available for palliating them.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 6 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 395 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 2 <1%
United States 2 <1%
Australia 1 <1%
India 1 <1%
Malaysia 1 <1%
New Zealand 1 <1%
Colombia 1 <1%
Japan 1 <1%
Nigeria 1 <1%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 384 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 59 15%
Student > Bachelor 44 11%
Other 42 11%
Researcher 34 9%
Student > Doctoral Student 29 7%
Other 91 23%
Unknown 96 24%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 163 41%
Nursing and Health Professions 37 9%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 26 7%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 13 3%
Psychology 12 3%
Other 38 10%
Unknown 106 27%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 35. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 10 March 2023.
All research outputs
#1,181,277
of 26,017,215 outputs
Outputs from Clinical Interventions in Aging
#115
of 1,986 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#4,991
of 140,058 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Clinical Interventions in Aging
#1
of 7 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,017,215 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 95th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,986 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 11.4. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 140,058 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 7 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them