↓ Skip to main content

Dove Medical Press

Filament formation associated with spirochetal infection: a comparative approach to Morgellons disease

Overview of attention for article published in Clinical, Cosmetic and Investigational Dermatology, November 2011
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (98th percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (60th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
twitter
71 X users
facebook
20 Facebook pages
wikipedia
3 Wikipedia pages
googleplus
4 Google+ users
video
2 YouTube creators

Citations

dimensions_citation
29 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
37 Mendeley
Title
Filament formation associated with spirochetal infection: a comparative approach to Morgellons disease
Published in
Clinical, Cosmetic and Investigational Dermatology, November 2011
DOI 10.2147/ccid.s26183
Pubmed ID
Authors

Marianne J Middelveen, Raphael B Stricker

Abstract

Bovine digital dermatitis is an emerging infectious disease that causes lameness, decreased milk production, and weight loss in livestock. Proliferative stages of bovine digital dermatitis demonstrate keratin filament formation in skin above the hooves in affected animals. The multifactorial etiology of digital dermatitis is not well understood, but spirochetes and other coinfecting microorganisms have been implicated in the pathogenesis of this veterinary illness. Morgellons disease is an emerging human dermopathy characterized by the presence of filamentous fibers of undetermined composition, both in lesions and subdermally. While the etiology of Morgellons disease is unknown, there is serological and clinical evidence linking this phenomenon to Lyme borreliosis and coinfecting tick-borne agents. Although the microscopy of Morgellons filaments has been described in the medical literature, the structure and pathogenesis of these fibers is poorly understood. In contrast, most microscopy of digital dermatitis has focused on associated pathogens and histology rather than the morphology of late-stage filamentous fibers. Clinical, laboratory, and microscopic characteristics of these two diseases are compared.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 71 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 37 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 1 3%
Unknown 36 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 8 22%
Student > Ph. D. Student 5 14%
Student > Doctoral Student 4 11%
Other 3 8%
Student > Bachelor 3 8%
Other 5 14%
Unknown 9 24%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 9 24%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 6 16%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 4 11%
Nursing and Health Professions 2 5%
Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine 2 5%
Other 4 11%
Unknown 10 27%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 80. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 17 March 2024.
All research outputs
#535,868
of 25,374,917 outputs
Outputs from Clinical, Cosmetic and Investigational Dermatology
#59
of 905 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#2,018
of 153,814 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Clinical, Cosmetic and Investigational Dermatology
#2
of 5 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,917 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 97th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 905 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 23.2. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 153,814 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 5 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 3 of them.