↓ Skip to main content

Dove Medical Press

Article Metrics

Development and Evaluation of a Prediction Model for Ascertaining Rheumatic Heart Disease Status in Administrative Data

Overview of attention for article published in Clinical Epidemiology, July 2020
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (55th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
3 tweeters

Citations

dimensions_citation
3 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
1 Mendeley
Title
<p>Development and Evaluation of a Prediction Model for Ascertaining Rheumatic Heart Disease Status in Administrative Data</p>
Published in
Clinical Epidemiology, July 2020
DOI 10.2147/clep.s241588
Authors

D Bond-Smith, R Seth, N de Klerk, L Nedkoff, M Anderson, J Hung, J Cannon, K Griffiths, JM Katzenellenbogen

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 1 Mendeley reader of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 1 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 1 100%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Unknown 1 100%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 20 August 2020.
All research outputs
#8,495,141
of 15,882,608 outputs
Outputs from Clinical Epidemiology
#242
of 523 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#125,050
of 285,782 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Clinical Epidemiology
#1
of 1 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 15,882,608 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 45th percentile – i.e., 45% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 523 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 11.2. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 52% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 285,782 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 55% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them