@TweetsMetis @peta @animalresearch Thus, in rodents, a damaged embryo will be resorbed, hiding any chemical induced birth deformities that could affect human embryos and fetuses. Reference https://t.co/IpfggcxJ90
@EpsiHapsi @Veillerette The public and the legislators still have not joined the dots between the lobbying efforts of the chemical industry and the alibi role of animal tests when formulating public health policy https://t.co/fFNVbTP3JX https://t.co/Rn3
@DES_Journal It is animal testing that got us into this mess in the first place. Industry and regulators have ignored human biomonitoring for decades and relied on animal tests to enact public policy. See :https://t.co/fFNVbTP3JX
@blacker_david @genefutures @dguillaume26 @Veillerette @Min_Agriculture @Inserm But as a consumer you still eat, drink and breathe toxic chemicals even if you buy organic : https://t.co/fFNVbTP3JX
@GiesAndreas @sfoucart @EFSA_EU @EPA Animal tests can prove or disprove virtually anything. The real problem is that there is no legal requirement to conduct human biomonitoring once an industrial chemical is put on the market. Hence the lack of valuable h
Andre Menache of @antidote_europe on the use of animal testing in the EU's REACH program http://t.co/G6atk4SLrB
Andre Menache of @antidote_europe on the use of animal testing in the EU's REACH program http://t.co/G6atk4SLrB
Andre Menache of @antidote_europe on the use of animal testing in the EU's REACH program http://t.co/G6atk4SLrB
"REACH, animal testing, and the precautionary principle" http://t.co/igvWmlK7 "..the animal model fails as a predictive modality for humans"
REACH animal testing and the precautionary principle http://t.co/C9pHRymB #dovepress