| Title |
Systematic review of immunomodulatory therapies for hidradenitis suppurativa
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Biologics: Targets & Therapy, May 2019
|
| DOI | 10.2147/btt.s199862 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Shi Yu Derek Lim, Hazel H Oon |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 155 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 155 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 22 | 14% |
| Student > Bachelor | 19 | 12% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 15 | 10% |
| Student > Master | 14 | 9% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 8 | 5% |
| Other | 27 | 17% |
| Unknown | 50 | 32% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 61 | 39% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 7 | 5% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 6 | 4% |
| Immunology and Microbiology | 6 | 4% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 4 | 3% |
| Other | 18 | 12% |
| Unknown | 53 | 34% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 16. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 20 October 2023.
All research outputs
#2,320,622
of 25,385,509 outputs
Outputs from Biologics: Targets & Therapy
#21
of 284 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#49,911
of 363,254 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Biologics: Targets & Therapy
#2
of 4 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,385,509 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 90th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 284 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.2. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 363,254 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 4 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 2 of them.