↓ Skip to main content

Dove Medical Press

Article Metrics

Comparison of chemiluminescence immunoassay, enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay and passive agglutination for diagnosis of Mycoplasma pneumoniae infection

Overview of attention for article published in Therapeutics and Clinical Risk Management, June 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (76th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet

Citations

dimensions_citation
12 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
22 Mendeley
Title
Comparison of chemiluminescence immunoassay, enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay and passive agglutination for diagnosis of <em>Mycoplasma pneumoniae</em> infection
Published in
Therapeutics and Clinical Risk Management, June 2018
DOI 10.2147/tcrm.s159227
Pubmed ID
Authors

Dongmiao Chen, Yajie Zhang, Yinjuan Xu, Tingting Shen, Guorui Cheng, Bingkang Huang, Xiandong Ruan, Congrong Wang

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 22 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 22 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 4 18%
Student > Postgraduate 3 14%
Student > Doctoral Student 3 14%
Student > Bachelor 3 14%
Other 2 9%
Other 3 14%
Unknown 4 18%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 5 23%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 3 14%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1 5%
Nursing and Health Professions 1 5%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 1 5%
Other 4 18%
Unknown 7 32%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 8. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 24 August 2020.
All research outputs
#2,755,444
of 17,033,237 outputs
Outputs from Therapeutics and Clinical Risk Management
#123
of 1,092 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#71,955
of 305,647 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Therapeutics and Clinical Risk Management
#1
of 1 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 17,033,237 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 83rd percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,092 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.9. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 305,647 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 76% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them