↓ Skip to main content

Dove Medical Press

Comparison of chemiluminescence immunoassay, enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay and passive agglutination for diagnosis of Mycoplasma pneumoniae infection

Overview of attention for article published in Therapeutics and Clinical Risk Management, June 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (82nd percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (87th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
patent
1 patent

Citations

dimensions_citation
29 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
40 Mendeley
Title
Comparison of chemiluminescence immunoassay, enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay and passive agglutination for diagnosis of Mycoplasma pneumoniae infection
Published in
Therapeutics and Clinical Risk Management, June 2018
DOI 10.2147/tcrm.s159227
Pubmed ID
Authors

Dongmiao Chen, Yajie Zhang, Yinjuan Xu, Tingting Shen, Guorui Cheng, Bingkang Huang, Xiandong Ruan, Congrong Wang

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 40 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 40 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 6 15%
Student > Master 4 10%
Student > Doctoral Student 4 10%
Other 3 8%
Researcher 3 8%
Other 9 23%
Unknown 11 28%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 7 18%
Immunology and Microbiology 4 10%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 4 10%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 2 5%
Unspecified 2 5%
Other 6 15%
Unknown 15 38%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 11. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 29 July 2021.
All research outputs
#3,140,080
of 25,382,440 outputs
Outputs from Therapeutics and Clinical Risk Management
#147
of 1,323 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#61,132
of 342,877 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Therapeutics and Clinical Risk Management
#4
of 33 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,382,440 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 87th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,323 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 9.6. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 342,877 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 33 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its contemporaries.