↓ Skip to main content

Dove Medical Press

Article Metrics

Establishing a laboratory network of influenza diagnosis in Indonesia: an experience from the avian flu (H5N1) outbreak

Overview of attention for article published in Clinical Epidemiology, August 2012
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 tweeter

Citations

dimensions_citation
2 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
16 Mendeley
Title
Establishing a laboratory network of influenza diagnosis in Indonesia: an experience from the avian flu (H5N1) outbreak
Published in
Clinical Epidemiology, August 2012
DOI 10.2147/clep.s31004
Pubmed ID
Authors

Vivi Setiawaty, Pangesti, Sampurno

Abstract

Indonesia has been part of the global influenza surveillance since the establishment of a National Influenza Center (NIC) at the National Institute of Health Research and Development (NIHRD) by the Indonesian Ministry of Health in 1975. When the outbreak of avian influenza A (H5N1) occurred, the NIC and US Naval Medical Research Unit 2 were the only diagnostic laboratories equipped for etiology confirmation. The large geographical area of the Republic of Indonesia poses a real challenge to provide prompt and accurate diagnosis nationally. This was the main reason to establish a laboratory network for H5N1 diagnosis in Indonesia. Currently, 44 laboratories have been included in the network capable of performing polymerase chain reaction testing for influenza A. Diagnostic equipment and standard procedures of biosafety and biosecurity of handling specimens have been adopted largely from World Health Organization recommendations.

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 tweeter who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 16 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Malaysia 1 6%
Denmark 1 6%
Unknown 14 88%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 8 50%
Professor 2 13%
Librarian 1 6%
Student > Ph. D. Student 1 6%
Student > Master 1 6%
Other 1 6%
Unknown 2 13%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 4 25%
Medicine and Dentistry 3 19%
Immunology and Microbiology 2 13%
Nursing and Health Professions 1 6%
Business, Management and Accounting 1 6%
Other 4 25%
Unknown 1 6%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 15 August 2012.
All research outputs
#3,530,331
of 4,506,762 outputs
Outputs from Clinical Epidemiology
#113
of 133 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#58,250
of 76,024 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Clinical Epidemiology
#14
of 18 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 4,506,762 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 2nd percentile – i.e., 2% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 133 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.9. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 76,024 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 18 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.