↓ Skip to main content

Dove Medical Press

Article Metrics

A Comparison of Conventional Intravitreal Injection Method vs InVitria Intravitreal Injection Method

Overview of attention for article published in Clinical Ophthalmology, August 2020
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age

Mentioned by

twitter
1 tweeter

Citations

dimensions_citation
1 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
2 Mendeley
Title
<p>A Comparison of Conventional Intravitreal Injection Method vs InVitria Intravitreal Injection Method</p>
Published in
Clinical Ophthalmology, August 2020
DOI 10.2147/opth.s238529
Authors

Michelle Blyth, William Innes, Nyma Mohsin-Shaikh, James Talks

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 tweeter who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 2 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 2 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 1 50%
Unknown 1 50%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 1 50%
Unknown 1 50%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 26 August 2020.
All research outputs
#11,005,590
of 17,043,172 outputs
Outputs from Clinical Ophthalmology
#1,227
of 2,430 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#185,318
of 305,874 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Clinical Ophthalmology
#41
of 117 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 17,043,172 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 23rd percentile – i.e., 23% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,430 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.6. This one is in the 27th percentile – i.e., 27% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 305,874 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 30th percentile – i.e., 30% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 117 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.