↓ Skip to main content

Dove Medical Press

Article Metrics

Early Ophthalmic Changes in Macula Does Not Correlate with Visual Function

Overview of attention for article published in Clinical Ophthalmology, September 2020
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 tweeter

Readers on

mendeley
5 Mendeley
Title
<p>Early Ophthalmic Changes in Macula Does Not Correlate with Visual Function</p>
Published in
Clinical Ophthalmology, September 2020
DOI 10.2147/opth.s260787
Authors

Divya Narayanan, Garrick Wallstrom, John Rodriguez, Donna Welch, Matthew Chapin, Paul Arrigg, Rajkumar Patil, Mark Abelson

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 tweeter who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 5 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 5 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Professor 1 20%
Student > Bachelor 1 20%
Researcher 1 20%
Student > Postgraduate 1 20%
Unknown 1 20%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 1 20%
Neuroscience 1 20%
Unknown 3 60%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 03 September 2020.
All research outputs
#14,345,802
of 21,371,670 outputs
Outputs from Clinical Ophthalmology
#1,305
of 2,466 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#198,195
of 316,956 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Clinical Ophthalmology
#43
of 112 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 21,371,670 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,466 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.9. This one is in the 36th percentile – i.e., 36% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 316,956 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 28th percentile – i.e., 28% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 112 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 4th percentile – i.e., 4% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.