↓ Skip to main content

Dove Medical Press

Article Metrics

In vivo Imaging of Reis–Bücklers and Thiel–Behnke Corneal Dystrophies Using Anterior Segment Optical Coherence Tomography

Overview of attention for article published in Clinical Ophthalmology, September 2020
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
2 tweeters

Citations

dimensions_citation
5 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
5 Mendeley
Title
<p>In vivo Imaging of Reis–Bücklers and Thiel–Behnke Corneal Dystrophies Using Anterior Segment Optical Coherence Tomography</p>
Published in
Clinical Ophthalmology, September 2020
DOI 10.2147/opth.s265136
Pubmed ID
Authors

Tsubasa Nishino, Akira Kobayashi, Natsuko Mori, Hideaki Yokogawa, Kazuhisa Sugiyama

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 5 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 5 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 2 40%
Student > Bachelor 1 20%
Unknown 2 40%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 3 60%
Unknown 2 40%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 08 September 2020.
All research outputs
#17,751,466
of 21,958,674 outputs
Outputs from Clinical Ophthalmology
#2,394
of 3,036 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#242,415
of 320,551 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Clinical Ophthalmology
#132
of 134 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 21,958,674 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,036 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.6. This one is in the 6th percentile – i.e., 6% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 320,551 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 14th percentile – i.e., 14% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 134 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 2nd percentile – i.e., 2% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.