↓ Skip to main content

Dove Medical Press

Epilepsy: addressing the transition from pediatric to adult care

Overview of attention for article published in Adolescent Health, Medicine and Therapeutics, June 2016
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age

Mentioned by

twitter
3 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
34 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
55 Mendeley
Title
Epilepsy: addressing the transition from pediatric to adult care
Published in
Adolescent Health, Medicine and Therapeutics, June 2016
DOI 10.2147/ahmt.s79060
Pubmed ID
Authors

Seetha Rajendran, Anand Iyer

Abstract

Adolescence is a period of rapid change, both physical and psychosocial for any young person. It can be challenging when they have ongoing health problems and when their care needs to be transitioned to the adult health care system. Transition should be a planned process of addressing the medical and associated comorbid conditions from pediatric to adult care in a coordinated manner. In most cases, the young person and their family are well known to the pediatrics services and have built a relationship based on trust and often friendship over many years. Understandably, there is significant apprehension about moving from this familiar setting to the unknown adult services. Apart from having a sound knowledge of specific childhood epileptic conditions and associated comorbid disorders, it is important that both the pediatric and adult epilepsy teams are motivated to provide a successful and safe transition for these patients. It is essential that transition is seen as a continual process and not as a single event, and good preparation is the key to its success. It is also important that general practitioners are closely engaged to ensure successful transition. An overview of how to effectively address transition in epilepsy, different models of transition, transition of relevant epilepsies, and their management is discussed.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 55 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 55 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Postgraduate 5 9%
Student > Master 5 9%
Student > Doctoral Student 5 9%
Student > Ph. D. Student 4 7%
Student > Bachelor 3 5%
Other 11 20%
Unknown 22 40%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 18 33%
Nursing and Health Professions 4 7%
Psychology 4 7%
Immunology and Microbiology 1 2%
Social Sciences 1 2%
Other 3 5%
Unknown 24 44%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 27 June 2016.
All research outputs
#16,783,081
of 25,457,858 outputs
Outputs from Adolescent Health, Medicine and Therapeutics
#109
of 151 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#215,513
of 353,828 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Adolescent Health, Medicine and Therapeutics
#1
of 1 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,457,858 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 32nd percentile – i.e., 32% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 151 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 29.7. This one is in the 24th percentile – i.e., 24% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 353,828 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 36th percentile – i.e., 36% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them