↓ Skip to main content

Dove Medical Press

Article Metrics

Choroidal Thickness and microRNA146 in Lupus Nephritis Patients [Letter]

Overview of attention for article published in Clinical Ophthalmology, September 2020
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 tweeter

Citations

dimensions_citation
6 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
1 Mendeley
Title
<p>Choroidal Thickness and microRNA146 in Lupus Nephritis Patients [Letter]</p>
Published in
Clinical Ophthalmology, September 2020
DOI 10.2147/opth.s279039
Authors

Luigi Capasso, Marco Gioia, Maddalena De Bernardo, Nicola Rosa

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 tweeter who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 1 Mendeley reader of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 1 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Unknown 1 100%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Unknown 1 100%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 22 September 2020.
All research outputs
#16,652,599
of 18,827,396 outputs
Outputs from Clinical Ophthalmology
#1,913
of 2,260 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#269,258
of 319,166 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Clinical Ophthalmology
#47
of 65 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 18,827,396 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,260 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.9. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 319,166 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 65 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.