Title |
Towards real-time detection of tumor margins using photothermal imaging of immune-targeted gold nanoparticles
|
---|---|
Published in |
International Journal of Nanomedicine, August 2012
|
DOI | 10.2147/ijn.s34157 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Kobi Jakobsohn, Menachem Motiei, Moshe Sinvani, Rachela Popovtzer |
Abstract |
One of the critical problems in cancer management is local recurrence of disease. Between 20% and 30% of patients who undergo tumor resection surgery require reoperation due to incomplete excision. Currently, there are no validated methods for intraoperative tumor margin detection. In the present work, we demonstrate the potential use of gold nanoparticles (GNPs) as a novel contrast agent for photothermal molecular imaging of cancer. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 54 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Egypt | 2 | 4% |
Switzerland | 1 | 2% |
Unknown | 51 | 94% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Ph. D. Student | 26 | 48% |
Student > Master | 6 | 11% |
Researcher | 5 | 9% |
Student > Bachelor | 3 | 6% |
Student > Doctoral Student | 2 | 4% |
Other | 8 | 15% |
Unknown | 4 | 7% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Engineering | 16 | 30% |
Chemistry | 9 | 17% |
Medicine and Dentistry | 8 | 15% |
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 6 | 11% |
Physics and Astronomy | 4 | 7% |
Other | 5 | 9% |
Unknown | 6 | 11% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 28 August 2012.
All research outputs
#20,110,957
of 25,584,565 outputs
Outputs from International Journal of Nanomedicine
#2,965
of 4,077 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#135,691
of 179,468 outputs
Outputs of similar age from International Journal of Nanomedicine
#64
of 74 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,584,565 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 18th percentile – i.e., 18% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,077 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.8. This one is in the 23rd percentile – i.e., 23% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 179,468 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 74 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 12th percentile – i.e., 12% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.