↓ Skip to main content

Dove Medical Press

A Review of Advancements and Evidence Gaps in Diabetic Retinopathy Screening Models

Overview of attention for article published in Clinical Ophthalmology, October 2020
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
18 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
39 Mendeley
Title
A Review of Advancements and Evidence Gaps in Diabetic Retinopathy Screening Models
Published in
Clinical Ophthalmology, October 2020
DOI 10.2147/opth.s267521
Pubmed ID
Authors

Elizabeth Pearce, Sobha Sivaprasad

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 39 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 39 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 5 13%
Researcher 4 10%
Student > Postgraduate 2 5%
Student > Bachelor 2 5%
Other 1 3%
Other 3 8%
Unknown 22 56%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 7 18%
Engineering 4 10%
Computer Science 1 3%
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 1 3%
Decision Sciences 1 3%
Other 3 8%
Unknown 22 56%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 14 October 2020.
All research outputs
#20,110,957
of 25,584,565 outputs
Outputs from Clinical Ophthalmology
#2,415
of 3,687 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#315,291
of 433,566 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Clinical Ophthalmology
#155
of 163 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,584,565 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 18th percentile – i.e., 18% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,687 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.0. This one is in the 31st percentile – i.e., 31% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 433,566 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 23rd percentile – i.e., 23% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 163 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 3rd percentile – i.e., 3% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.