↓ Skip to main content

Dove Medical Press

Long term results of a prospective randomized bilateral eye comparison trial of higher fluence, shorter duration ultraviolet A radiation, and riboflavin collagen cross linking for progressive…

Overview of attention for article published in Clinical Ophthalmology, January 2012
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (78th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (84th percentile)

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source
twitter
3 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
174 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
88 Mendeley
Title
Long term results of a prospective randomized bilateral eye comparison trial of higher fluence, shorter duration ultraviolet A radiation, and riboflavin collagen cross linking for progressive keratoconus
Published in
Clinical Ophthalmology, January 2012
DOI 10.2147/opth.s27170
Pubmed ID
Authors

Anastasios John Kanellopoulos

Abstract

To evaluate the safety and efficacy of higher fluence cornea collagen cross linking (CXL).

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 88 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Turkey 1 1%
India 1 1%
United Kingdom 1 1%
Mexico 1 1%
United States 1 1%
Unknown 83 94%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 19 22%
Other 10 11%
Student > Ph. D. Student 9 10%
Student > Bachelor 9 10%
Student > Master 9 10%
Other 13 15%
Unknown 19 22%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 47 53%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 9 10%
Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine 2 2%
Business, Management and Accounting 1 1%
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 1 1%
Other 1 1%
Unknown 27 31%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 17 April 2022.
All research outputs
#6,496,106
of 25,374,917 outputs
Outputs from Clinical Ophthalmology
#553
of 3,712 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#53,006
of 250,100 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Clinical Ophthalmology
#4
of 25 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,917 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 74th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,712 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.9. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 250,100 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 78% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 25 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its contemporaries.