| Title |
Building a measurement framework of burden of treatment in complex patients with chronic conditions: a qualitative study
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Patient related outcome measures, August 2012
|
| DOI | 10.2147/prom.s34681 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
David T Eton, Djenane Ramalho de Oliveira, Jason S Egginton, Jennifer L Ridgeway, Laura Odell, Carl R May, Victor M Montori |
| Abstract |
Burden of treatment refers to the workload of health care as well as its impact on patient functioning and well-being. We set out to build a conceptual framework of issues descriptive of burden of treatment from the perspective of the complex patient, as a first step in the development of a new patient-reported measure. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 1 | 50% |
| Unknown | 1 | 50% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 1 | 50% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 50% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 173 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Portugal | 1 | <1% |
| Sweden | 1 | <1% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | <1% |
| Canada | 1 | <1% |
| Argentina | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 168 | 97% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 32 | 18% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 22 | 13% |
| Student > Master | 22 | 13% |
| Other | 9 | 5% |
| Student > Bachelor | 9 | 5% |
| Other | 36 | 21% |
| Unknown | 43 | 25% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 47 | 27% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 23 | 13% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 13 | 8% |
| Social Sciences | 13 | 8% |
| Psychology | 7 | 4% |
| Other | 20 | 12% |
| Unknown | 50 | 29% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 06 December 2016.
All research outputs
#7,356,550
of 25,374,917 outputs
Outputs from Patient related outcome measures
#48
of 196 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#50,861
of 179,162 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Patient related outcome measures
#1
of 2 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,917 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 69th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 196 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.7. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 74% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 179,162 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 70% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 2 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them