↓ Skip to main content

Dove Medical Press

Article Metrics

Building a measurement framework of burden of treatment in complex patients with chronic conditions: a qualitative study

Overview of attention for article published in Patient related outcome measures, August 2012
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#34 of 149)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (72nd percentile)

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source
twitter
2 tweeters

Citations

dimensions_citation
154 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
102 Mendeley
Title
Building a measurement framework of burden of treatment in complex patients with chronic conditions: a qualitative study
Published in
Patient related outcome measures, August 2012
DOI 10.2147/prom.s34681
Pubmed ID
Authors

David Eton, Djenane Ramalho de Oliveira, Jason Egginton, Jennifer Ridgeway, Laura Odell, Carl May, Victor Montori, Victor M Montori, David T Eton, Jason S Egginton, Jennifer L Ridgeway, Carl R May

Abstract

Burden of treatment refers to the workload of health care as well as its impact on patient functioning and well-being. We set out to build a conceptual framework of issues descriptive of burden of treatment from the perspective of the complex patient, as a first step in the development of a new patient-reported measure.

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 102 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Portugal 1 <1%
Sweden 1 <1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Canada 1 <1%
Argentina 1 <1%
Unknown 97 95%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 20 20%
Student > Master 15 15%
Student > Ph. D. Student 14 14%
Student > Bachelor 8 8%
Other 6 6%
Other 23 23%
Unknown 16 16%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 36 35%
Nursing and Health Professions 11 11%
Social Sciences 8 8%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 7 7%
Psychology 6 6%
Other 12 12%
Unknown 22 22%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 06 December 2016.
All research outputs
#4,862,786
of 17,351,915 outputs
Outputs from Patient related outcome measures
#34
of 149 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#36,514
of 138,710 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Patient related outcome measures
#1
of 3 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 17,351,915 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 70th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 149 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.3. This one has done well, scoring higher than 75% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 138,710 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 72% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 3 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them