↓ Skip to main content

Dove Medical Press

Exploring the relationship between maternal iron status and offspring’s blood pressure and adiposity: a Mendelian randomization study

Overview of attention for article published in Clinical Epidemiology, August 2012
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
3 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
10 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
50 Mendeley
Title
Exploring the relationship between maternal iron status and offspring’s blood pressure and adiposity: a Mendelian randomization study
Published in
Clinical Epidemiology, August 2012
DOI 10.2147/clep.s33833
Pubmed ID
Authors

Nisreen A Alwan, Debbie A Lawlor, Harry J McArdle, Darren C Greenwood, Janet E Cade

Abstract

Iron deficiency is the most common micronutrient deficiency worldwide. Experimental animal studies suggest that mothers deficient in iron during pregnancy are more likely to have offspring who become obese with high blood pressure. C282Y mutation carriers are more likely to have higher iron stores.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 50 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 50 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 9 18%
Student > Bachelor 7 14%
Student > Master 7 14%
Student > Doctoral Student 3 6%
Lecturer 1 2%
Other 4 8%
Unknown 19 38%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 18 36%
Nursing and Health Professions 3 6%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 3 6%
Mathematics 2 4%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 2 4%
Other 3 6%
Unknown 19 38%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 22 September 2012.
All research outputs
#15,739,529
of 25,373,627 outputs
Outputs from Clinical Epidemiology
#451
of 793 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#107,536
of 179,163 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Clinical Epidemiology
#6
of 10 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,373,627 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 37th percentile – i.e., 37% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 793 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.5. This one is in the 41st percentile – i.e., 41% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 179,163 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 39th percentile – i.e., 39% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 10 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 4 of them.