↓ Skip to main content

Dove Medical Press

Article Metrics

Efficiency of Operating Room Processes for Elective Cataract Surgeries Done by Residents in a National University Hospital

Overview of attention for article published in Clinical Ophthalmology, October 2020
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age

Mentioned by

twitter
1 tweeter

Readers on

mendeley
1 Mendeley
Title
<p>Efficiency of Operating Room Processes for Elective Cataract Surgeries Done by Residents in a National University Hospital</p>
Published in
Clinical Ophthalmology, October 2020
DOI 10.2147/opth.s277550
Authors

Maria Isabel N Umali, Teresita R Castillo

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 tweeter who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 1 Mendeley reader of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 1 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Unspecified 1 100%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Unspecified 1 100%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 27 October 2020.
All research outputs
#10,660,322
of 16,657,433 outputs
Outputs from Clinical Ophthalmology
#1,190
of 2,375 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#231,078
of 382,100 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Clinical Ophthalmology
#44
of 134 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 16,657,433 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 23rd percentile – i.e., 23% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,375 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.5. This one is in the 28th percentile – i.e., 28% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 382,100 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 30th percentile – i.e., 30% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 134 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.