| Title |
Udenafil for the treatment of erectile dysfunction
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Therapeutics and Clinical Risk Management, May 2014
|
| DOI | 10.2147/tcrm.s39727 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Min Chul Cho, Jae-Seung Paick |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 48 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| France | 1 | 2% |
| Unknown | 47 | 98% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 6 | 13% |
| Student > Master | 6 | 13% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 4 | 8% |
| Other | 3 | 6% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 3 | 6% |
| Other | 9 | 19% |
| Unknown | 17 | 35% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 13 | 27% |
| Social Sciences | 4 | 8% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 4 | 8% |
| Chemistry | 2 | 4% |
| Psychology | 2 | 4% |
| Other | 5 | 10% |
| Unknown | 18 | 38% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 15 May 2014.
All research outputs
#22,759,452
of 25,374,647 outputs
Outputs from Therapeutics and Clinical Risk Management
#1,204
of 1,323 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#209,806
of 242,177 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Therapeutics and Clinical Risk Management
#28
of 28 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,647 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,323 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 9.6. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 242,177 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 28 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.