↓ Skip to main content

Dove Medical Press

Economics of less invasive spinal surgery: an analysis of hospital cost differences between open and minimally invasive instrumented spinal fusion procedures during the perioperative period

Overview of attention for article published in Risk Management and Healthcare Policy, August 2012
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (81st percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (75th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet

Citations

dimensions_citation
84 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
75 Mendeley
Title
Economics of less invasive spinal surgery: an analysis of hospital cost differences between open and minimally invasive instrumented spinal fusion procedures during the perioperative period
Published in
Risk Management and Healthcare Policy, August 2012
DOI 10.2147/rmhp.s30974
Pubmed ID
Authors

John C Lucio, R Brent VanConia, Kevin J DeLuzio, Jeffrey A Lehmen, Jody A Rodgers, WB Rodgers

Abstract

There is great debate about the costs and benefits of technology-driven medical interventions such as instrumented lumbar fusion. With most analyses using charge data, the actual costs incurred by medical institutions performing these procedures are not well understood. The object of the current study was to examine the differences in hospital operating costs between open and minimally invasive spine surgery (MIS) during the perioperative period.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 75 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 4 5%
Colombia 1 1%
Germany 1 1%
South Africa 1 1%
Unknown 68 91%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 20 27%
Student > Master 11 15%
Other 9 12%
Student > Ph. D. Student 6 8%
Student > Bachelor 5 7%
Other 12 16%
Unknown 12 16%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 34 45%
Engineering 4 5%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 3 4%
Materials Science 2 3%
Social Sciences 2 3%
Other 11 15%
Unknown 19 25%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 7. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 02 July 2014.
All research outputs
#4,147,096
of 22,678,224 outputs
Outputs from Risk Management and Healthcare Policy
#115
of 606 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#28,918
of 164,714 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Risk Management and Healthcare Policy
#2
of 8 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,678,224 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 80th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 606 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 9.0. This one has done well, scoring higher than 79% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 164,714 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 81% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 8 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 6 of them.