↓ Skip to main content

Dove Medical Press

Article Metrics

Budget impact analysis of two immunotherapy products for treatment of grass pollen-induced allergic rhinoconjunctivitis

Overview of attention for article published in ClinicoEconomics and Outcomes Research: CEOR, September 2012
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (57th percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (60th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
5 tweeters
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
11 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
16 Mendeley
Title
Budget impact analysis of two immunotherapy products for treatment of grass pollen-induced allergic rhinoconjunctivitis
Published in
ClinicoEconomics and Outcomes Research: CEOR, September 2012
DOI 10.2147/ceor.s34832
Pubmed ID
Authors

Jakob Nørgaard Andreasen, Rønborg, Svendsen, Micheelsen, Lars Ytte, Lars Ehlers

Abstract

Grass pollen-induced allergic rhinoconjunctivitis constitutes a large burden for society. Up to 20% of European and United States (US) populations suffer from respiratory allergies, including grass pollen-induced allergic rhinoconjunctivitis. The majority of patients are treated with symptomatic medications; however, a large proportion remains uncontrolled despite use of such treatments. Specific immunotherapy is the only treatment documented to target the underlying cause of the disease, leading to a sustained effect after completion of treatment. The aim of this study was to compare the economic consequences of treating patients suffering from allergic rhinoconjunctivitis with either a grass allergy immunotherapy tablet (AIT) or subcutaneous immunotherapy (SCIT).

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 16 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Austria 1 6%
Unknown 15 94%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 6 38%
Researcher 4 25%
Student > Bachelor 2 13%
Other 2 13%
Student > Postgraduate 1 6%
Other 1 6%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 7 44%
Business, Management and Accounting 3 19%
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 2 13%
Chemistry 2 13%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1 6%
Other 1 6%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 28 November 2012.
All research outputs
#5,759,308
of 11,344,729 outputs
Outputs from ClinicoEconomics and Outcomes Research: CEOR
#111
of 309 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#48,006
of 113,278 outputs
Outputs of similar age from ClinicoEconomics and Outcomes Research: CEOR
#4
of 10 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 11,344,729 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 48th percentile – i.e., 48% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 309 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.7. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 63% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 113,278 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 57% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 10 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 6 of them.