| Title |
Five-year extension of a clinical trial comparing the EX-PRESS glaucoma filtration device and trabeculectomy in primary open-angle glaucoma
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Clinical Ophthalmology, April 2011
|
| DOI | 10.2147/opth.s18565 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Leo de Jong, Antoine Lafuma, Anne-Sophie Aguadé, Gilles Berdeaux |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 69 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Malaysia | 1 | 1% |
| Spain | 1 | 1% |
| Unknown | 67 | 97% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 13 | 19% |
| Student > Master | 10 | 14% |
| Other | 9 | 13% |
| Researcher | 9 | 13% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 8 | 12% |
| Other | 13 | 19% |
| Unknown | 7 | 10% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 45 | 65% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 5 | 7% |
| Economics, Econometrics and Finance | 3 | 4% |
| Social Sciences | 2 | 3% |
| Computer Science | 1 | 1% |
| Other | 3 | 4% |
| Unknown | 10 | 14% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 11 November 2015.
All research outputs
#8,534,976
of 25,374,647 outputs
Outputs from Clinical Ophthalmology
#820
of 3,712 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#44,881
of 120,716 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Clinical Ophthalmology
#8
of 19 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,647 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,712 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.9. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 73% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 120,716 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 26th percentile – i.e., 26% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 19 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 36th percentile – i.e., 36% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.