| Title |
A review of exenatide as adjunctive therapy in patients with type 2 diabetes
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Drug Design, Development and Therapy, September 2009
|
| DOI | 10.2147/dddt.s3321 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Gisela I Robles, Devada Singh-Franco |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 86 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Brazil | 1 | 1% |
| Unknown | 85 | 99% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 17 | 20% |
| Researcher | 11 | 13% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 11 | 13% |
| Student > Bachelor | 9 | 10% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 7 | 8% |
| Other | 10 | 12% |
| Unknown | 21 | 24% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 28 | 33% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 7 | 8% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 6 | 7% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 5 | 6% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 4 | 5% |
| Other | 11 | 13% |
| Unknown | 25 | 29% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 26 November 2015.
All research outputs
#8,534,528
of 25,371,288 outputs
Outputs from Drug Design, Development and Therapy
#642
of 2,268 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#36,365
of 102,312 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Drug Design, Development and Therapy
#1
of 1 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,371,288 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,268 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.1. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 66% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 102,312 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 19th percentile – i.e., 19% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them