| Title |
Improved in vitro and in vivo Anti-Candida albicans Activity of Cymbopogon nardus Essential Oil by Its Incorporation into a Microemulsion System
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
International Journal of Nanomedicine, December 2020
|
| DOI | 10.2147/ijn.s275258 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Luciani Gaspar de Toledo, Matheus Aparecido dos Santos Ramos, Patrícia Bento da Silva, Camila Fernanda Rodero, Veridiana de Sá Gomes, Anderson Noronha da Silva, Fernando Rogério Pavan, Isabel Cristiane da Silva, Fernando Bombarda Oda, Danilo Luis Flumignan, André Gonzaga dos Santos, Marlus Chorilli, Margarete Teresa Gottardo de Almeida, Taís Maria Bauab |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 1 | 50% |
| Unknown | 1 | 50% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 2 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 66 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 66 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Bachelor | 8 | 12% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 7 | 11% |
| Student > Master | 6 | 9% |
| Lecturer | 3 | 5% |
| Professor | 2 | 3% |
| Other | 8 | 12% |
| Unknown | 32 | 48% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 11 | 17% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 7 | 11% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 4 | 6% |
| Immunology and Microbiology | 3 | 5% |
| Chemistry | 2 | 3% |
| Other | 5 | 8% |
| Unknown | 34 | 52% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 08 January 2021.
All research outputs
#16,733,516
of 25,387,668 outputs
Outputs from International Journal of Nanomedicine
#2,091
of 4,122 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#307,933
of 518,694 outputs
Outputs of similar age from International Journal of Nanomedicine
#29
of 62 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,387,668 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 32nd percentile – i.e., 32% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,122 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.7. This one is in the 40th percentile – i.e., 40% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 518,694 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 37th percentile – i.e., 37% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 62 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 50% of its contemporaries.