↓ Skip to main content

Dove Medical Press

New developments in cognitive behavioral therapy as the first-line treatment of insomnia

Overview of attention for article published in Psychology Research and Behavior Management, February 2011
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#17 of 627)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (98th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
5 news outlets
blogs
3 blogs
twitter
8 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
74 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
109 Mendeley
Title
New developments in cognitive behavioral therapy as the first-line treatment of insomnia
Published in
Psychology Research and Behavior Management, February 2011
DOI 10.2147/prbm.s10041
Pubmed ID
Authors

Allison T Siebern, Rachel Manber

Abstract

Insomnia is the most common sleep disorder. Psychological, behavioral, and biological factors are implicated in the development and maintenance of insomnia as a disorder, although the etiology of insomnia remains under investigation, as it is still not fully understood. Cognitive behavioral therapy for insomnia (CBTI) is a treatment for insomnia that is grounded in the science of behavior change, psychological theories, and the science of sleep. There is strong empirical evidence that CBTI is effective. Recognition of CBTI as the first-line treatment for chronic insomnia (National Institutes of Health consensus, British Medical Association) was based largely on evidence of its efficacy in primary insomnia. The aim of this article is to provide background information and review recent developments in CBTI, focusing on three domains: promising data on the use of CBTI when insomnia is experienced in the presence of comorbid conditions, new data on the use of CBTI as maintenance therapy, and emerging data on the delivery of CBTI through the use of technology and in primary care settings.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 8 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 109 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 2 2%
Japan 1 <1%
France 1 <1%
Unknown 105 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 20 18%
Student > Bachelor 17 16%
Researcher 14 13%
Student > Doctoral Student 11 10%
Student > Ph. D. Student 8 7%
Other 26 24%
Unknown 13 12%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 47 43%
Medicine and Dentistry 13 12%
Nursing and Health Professions 8 7%
Neuroscience 5 5%
Social Sciences 3 3%
Other 13 12%
Unknown 20 18%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 73. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 05 December 2023.
All research outputs
#538,304
of 23,928,031 outputs
Outputs from Psychology Research and Behavior Management
#17
of 627 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#2,341
of 188,553 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Psychology Research and Behavior Management
#1
of 2 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,928,031 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 97th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 627 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 11.0. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 188,553 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 2 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them