↓ Skip to main content

Dove Medical Press

Article Metrics

Biologic Therapies for Giant Cell Arteritis

Overview of attention for article published in Biologics: Targets & Therapy, January 2021
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (57th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
5 tweeters

Citations

dimensions_citation
4 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
12 Mendeley
Title
Biologic Therapies for Giant Cell Arteritis
Published in
Biologics: Targets & Therapy, January 2021
DOI 10.2147/btt.s229662
Pubmed ID
Authors

Harrington, Robert, Al Nokhatha, Shamma Ahmad, Conway, Richard

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 12 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 12 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 3 25%
Researcher 1 8%
Student > Doctoral Student 1 8%
Student > Master 1 8%
Unknown 6 50%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 4 33%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 1 8%
Unknown 7 58%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 17 January 2021.
All research outputs
#10,970,402
of 20,034,281 outputs
Outputs from Biologics: Targets & Therapy
#130
of 251 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#166,547
of 404,470 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Biologics: Targets & Therapy
#1
of 1 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 20,034,281 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 251 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.3. This one is in the 47th percentile – i.e., 47% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 404,470 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 57% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them