↓ Skip to main content

Dove Medical Press

Article Metrics

EACOL (Scale of Evaluation of Reading Competence by the Teacher): evidence of concurrent and discriminant validity

Overview of attention for article published in Neuropsychiatric Disease and Treatment, October 2012
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 tweeter

Citations

dimensions_citation
10 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
28 Mendeley
Title
EACOL (Scale of Evaluation of Reading Competence by the Teacher): evidence of concurrent and discriminant validity
Published in
Neuropsychiatric Disease and Treatment, October 2012
DOI 10.2147/ndt.s36196
Pubmed ID
Authors

Hugo Cogo-Moreira, Ploubidis, De Ávila, Jair Mari, Pinheiro

Abstract

The study aimed to provide information about the concurrent and discriminant validation of the Scale of Evaluation of Reading Competence by the Teacher (EACOL), which is composed of 27 dichotomous items concerning reading aloud (17 items) and reading silently (10 items).

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 tweeter who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 28 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 28 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 7 25%
Student > Master 4 14%
Student > Doctoral Student 2 7%
Student > Bachelor 2 7%
Professor > Associate Professor 2 7%
Other 7 25%
Unknown 4 14%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Social Sciences 7 25%
Psychology 6 21%
Linguistics 3 11%
Business, Management and Accounting 2 7%
Medicine and Dentistry 2 7%
Other 4 14%
Unknown 4 14%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 11 October 2012.
All research outputs
#3,479,808
of 4,505,285 outputs
Outputs from Neuropsychiatric Disease and Treatment
#769
of 908 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#60,479
of 80,277 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Neuropsychiatric Disease and Treatment
#10
of 12 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 4,505,285 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 2nd percentile – i.e., 2% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 908 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.5. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 80,277 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 12 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.