| Title |
Engaging in patient decision-making in multidisciplinary care for amyotrophic lateral sclerosis: the views of health professionals
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Patient preference and adherence, September 2012
|
| DOI | 10.2147/ppa.s36759 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Anne Hogden, David Greenfield, Peter Nugus, Matthew C Kiernan |
| Abstract |
The aim of this study was to explore clinician perspectives on patient decision-making in multidisciplinary care for amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS), in an attempt to identify factors influencing decision-making. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Italy | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 1 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 82 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 82 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 11 | 13% |
| Student > Bachelor | 9 | 11% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 8 | 10% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 8 | 10% |
| Other | 7 | 9% |
| Other | 16 | 20% |
| Unknown | 23 | 28% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 24 | 29% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 11 | 13% |
| Social Sciences | 7 | 9% |
| Psychology | 6 | 7% |
| Arts and Humanities | 3 | 4% |
| Other | 5 | 6% |
| Unknown | 26 | 32% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 24 February 2016.
All research outputs
#7,205,295
of 25,374,647 outputs
Outputs from Patient preference and adherence
#500
of 1,757 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#52,563
of 188,182 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Patient preference and adherence
#7
of 18 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,647 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 71st percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,757 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.5. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 70% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 188,182 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 71% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 18 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 61% of its contemporaries.