↓ Skip to main content

Dove Medical Press

Prevalence of extended-spectrum beta-lactamase-producing bacteria in food

Overview of attention for article published in Infection and Drug Resistance, October 2012
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age

Mentioned by

twitter
3 X users

Readers on

mendeley
83 Mendeley
Title
Prevalence of extended-spectrum beta-lactamase-producing bacteria in food
Published in
Infection and Drug Resistance, October 2012
DOI 10.2147/idr.s34941
Pubmed ID
Authors

Johan Tham, Mats Walder, Eva Melander, Inga Odenholt

Abstract

Extended-spectrum β-lactamase (ESBL)-producing Enterobacteriaceae with Cefotaximase-München (CTX-M) enzymes are rapidly increasing worldwide and pose a threat to health care. ESBLs with CTX-M enzymes have been isolated from animals and different food products, but it is unknown if food imported from the Mediterranean area may be a possible reservoir of these bacteria. During 2007-2008, swab samples from food across different retail outlets (mostly food from the Mediterranean countries and Swedish chicken) were collected. Escherichia coli strains from Swedish meat and E. coli isolates from unspecified food from a Swedish food testing laboratory were also examined. In 349 of the 419 swab samples, growth of Enterobacteriaceae was found. In most of the samples, there was also growth of Gram-negative environmental bacteria. Air dry-cured products contained significantly less Enterobacteriaceae isolates compared to lettuces; however, none of the examined Enterobacteriaceae harbored ESBLs. This study did not support the theory that imported food from the Mediterranean area or Swedish domestic food might constitute an important vehicle for the dissemination of ESBL-producing Enterobacteriaceae; however, a spread from food to humans may have occurred after 2008.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 83 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Ecuador 1 1%
Brazil 1 1%
South Africa 1 1%
India 1 1%
Denmark 1 1%
Unknown 78 94%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 15 18%
Student > Master 11 13%
Student > Doctoral Student 10 12%
Student > Bachelor 9 11%
Researcher 9 11%
Other 19 23%
Unknown 10 12%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 21 25%
Medicine and Dentistry 19 23%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 11 13%
Immunology and Microbiology 7 8%
Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine 4 5%
Other 9 11%
Unknown 12 14%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 08 September 2014.
All research outputs
#16,188,873
of 25,584,565 outputs
Outputs from Infection and Drug Resistance
#656
of 2,048 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#116,925
of 191,340 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Infection and Drug Resistance
#2
of 3 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,584,565 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 34th percentile – i.e., 34% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,048 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.9. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 63% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 191,340 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 36th percentile – i.e., 36% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 3 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.