| Title |
Telogen effluvium: a comprehensive review
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Clinical, Cosmetic and Investigational Dermatology, August 2019
|
| DOI | 10.2147/ccid.s200471 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Alfredo Rebora |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 134 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 134 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Bachelor | 20 | 15% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 13 | 10% |
| Other | 9 | 7% |
| Researcher | 9 | 7% |
| Student > Master | 9 | 7% |
| Other | 14 | 10% |
| Unknown | 60 | 45% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 54 | 40% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 5 | 4% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 4 | 3% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 2 | 1% |
| Social Sciences | 2 | 1% |
| Other | 5 | 4% |
| Unknown | 62 | 46% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 86. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 29 October 2022.
All research outputs
#497,028
of 25,385,509 outputs
Outputs from Clinical, Cosmetic and Investigational Dermatology
#54
of 906 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#10,317
of 359,381 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Clinical, Cosmetic and Investigational Dermatology
#2
of 13 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,385,509 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 98th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 906 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 23.2. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 359,381 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 13 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its contemporaries.