↓ Skip to main content

Dove Medical Press

Language and emotional abilities in children with Williams syndrome and children with autism spectrum disorder: similarities and differences

Overview of attention for article published in Pediatric Health, Medicine and Therapeutics, July 2016
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user
facebook
2 Facebook pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
11 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
55 Mendeley
Title
Language and emotional abilities in children with Williams syndrome and children with autism spectrum disorder: similarities and differences
Published in
Pediatric Health, Medicine and Therapeutics, July 2016
DOI 10.2147/phmt.s66347
Pubmed ID
Authors

Agnès Lacroix, Nawelle Famelart, Michèle Guidetti

Abstract

Williams syndrome (WS) is a genetic disease with a relatively homogeneous profile: relatively well-preserved language, impaired cognitive activities, and hypersociability. Autism spectrum disorder (ASD) refers to a group of individuals with impairments in aspects of communication and a particular pattern of language acquisition. Although ASD and WS are polar opposites when it comes to communication abilities (language and emotion) and social behavior, comparisons between WS and ASD are still rare in the literature. ASD and WS are both associated with general language and developmental delays. Difficulties in social interaction and general pragmatic difficulties are reported in both ASD and WS, but are more pervasive in ASD. Regarding facial emotion recognition, the two syndromes differ markedly in sensitivity to human faces. Despite the heterogeneity of these two groups, only a few studies with children have paid sufficient attention to participant recruitment and study design. A number of aspects need to be taken into account (eg, small age range, homogeneity of the subgroups, matching with typically developing children) if scientific results are to inform the design of intervention programs for children with neurodevelopmental disorders such as ASD and WS.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 55 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Spain 1 2%
Unknown 54 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 9 16%
Student > Master 7 13%
Student > Bachelor 5 9%
Lecturer 2 4%
Researcher 2 4%
Other 8 15%
Unknown 22 40%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 17 31%
Nursing and Health Professions 4 7%
Social Sciences 3 5%
Unspecified 2 4%
Medicine and Dentistry 2 4%
Other 6 11%
Unknown 21 38%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 17 November 2016.
All research outputs
#16,199,888
of 25,604,262 outputs
Outputs from Pediatric Health, Medicine and Therapeutics
#62
of 173 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#216,816
of 367,877 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Pediatric Health, Medicine and Therapeutics
#3
of 5 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,604,262 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 34th percentile – i.e., 34% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 173 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 9.0. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 59% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 367,877 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 38th percentile – i.e., 38% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 5 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 2 of them.