| Title |
Effects of Transcutaneous Electrical Acupoint Stimulation (TEAS) on Postoperative Recovery in Patients with Gastric Cancer: A Randomized Controlled Trial
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Cancer Management and Research, February 2021
|
| DOI | 10.2147/cmar.s292325 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Xin Zhou, Shou-Gen Cao, Xiao-Jie Tan, Xiao-Dong Liu, Ze-Qun Li, Ling-Xin Kong, Yu-Long Tian, Dan Liu, Shuai Shen, Yu-Qi Sun, Hai-Tao Jiang, Yan-Bing Zhou |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 10 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Spain | 4 | 40% |
| France | 3 | 30% |
| Unknown | 3 | 30% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 10 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 53 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 53 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 5 | 9% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 3 | 6% |
| Unspecified | 2 | 4% |
| Researcher | 2 | 4% |
| Student > Bachelor | 2 | 4% |
| Other | 4 | 8% |
| Unknown | 35 | 66% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 9 | 17% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 3 | 6% |
| Unspecified | 2 | 4% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 2 | 4% |
| Neuroscience | 2 | 4% |
| Other | 1 | 2% |
| Unknown | 34 | 64% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 19 July 2021.
All research outputs
#6,718,834
of 24,417,958 outputs
Outputs from Cancer Management and Research
#283
of 2,029 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#160,797
of 514,622 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cancer Management and Research
#18
of 120 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,417,958 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 72nd percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,029 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.5. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 514,622 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 68% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 120 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its contemporaries.