| Title |
Development of a framework for pneumatic device selection for lymphedema treatment
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Medical Devices : Evidence and Research, December 2009
|
| DOI | 10.2147/mder.s8137 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Sonja M Maul, Julie A Devine, Carolyn R Wincer |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 45 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Colombia | 1 | 2% |
| Unknown | 44 | 98% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unspecified | 10 | 22% |
| Student > Bachelor | 8 | 18% |
| Other | 5 | 11% |
| Librarian | 2 | 4% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 2 | 4% |
| Other | 9 | 20% |
| Unknown | 9 | 20% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 14 | 31% |
| Unspecified | 10 | 22% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 3 | 7% |
| Engineering | 2 | 4% |
| Computer Science | 1 | 2% |
| Other | 5 | 11% |
| Unknown | 10 | 22% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 June 2014.
All research outputs
#8,571,053
of 25,457,858 outputs
Outputs from Medical Devices : Evidence and Research
#124
of 314 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#51,579
of 177,310 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Medical Devices : Evidence and Research
#1
of 1 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,457,858 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 314 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 12.3. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 52% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 177,310 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 20th percentile – i.e., 20% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them