↓ Skip to main content

Dove Medical Press

Prediction Models for AKI in ICU: A Comparative Study

Overview of attention for article published in International Journal of General Medicine, February 2021
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
3 X users

Readers on

mendeley
32 Mendeley
Title
Prediction Models for AKI in ICU: A Comparative Study
Published in
International Journal of General Medicine, February 2021
DOI 10.2147/ijgm.s289671
Pubmed ID
Authors

Qing Qian, Jinming Wu, Jiayang Wang, Haixia Sun, Lei Yang

Abstract

To assess the performance of models for early prediction of acute kidney injury (AKI) in the Intensive Care Unit (ICU) setting. Data were collected from the Medical Information Mart for Intensive Care (MIMIC)-III database for all patients aged ≥18 years who had their serum creatinine (SCr) level measured for 72 h following ICU admission. Those with existing conditions of kidney disease upon ICU admission were excluded from our analyses. Seventeen predictor variables comprising patient demographics and physiological indicators were selected on the basis of the Kidney Disease Improving Global Outcomes (KDIGO) and medical literature. Six models from three types of methods were tested: Logistic Regression (LR), Support Vector Machines (SVM), Random Forest (RF), eXtreme Gradient Boosting (XGBoost), Light Gradient Boosting Decision Machine (LightGBM), and Convolutional Neural Network (CNN). The area under receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC), accuracy, precision, recall and F-measure (F1) were calculated for each model to evaluate performance. We extracted the ICU records of 17,205 patients from MIMIC-III dataset. LightGBM had the best performance, with all evaluation indicators achieving the highest value (average AUC = 0.905, F1 = 0.897, recall = 0.836). XGBoost had the second best performance and LR, RF, SVM performed similarly (P = 0.082, 0.158 and 0.710, respectively) on AUC. The CNN model achieved the lowest score for accuracy, precision, F1 and AUC. SVM and LR had relatively low recall compared with that of the other models. The SCr level had the most significant effect on the early prediction of AKI onset in LR, RF, SVM and LightGBM. LightGBM demonstrated the best capability for predicting AKI in the first 72 h of ICU admission. LightGBM and XGBoost showed great potential for clinical application owing to their high recall value. This study can provide references for artificial intelligence-powered clinical decision support systems for AKI early prediction in the ICU setting.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 32 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 32 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Other 3 9%
Student > Bachelor 3 9%
Student > Master 3 9%
Researcher 3 9%
Student > Postgraduate 2 6%
Other 4 13%
Unknown 14 44%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 7 22%
Nursing and Health Professions 3 9%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 2 6%
Computer Science 2 6%
Neuroscience 2 6%
Other 2 6%
Unknown 14 44%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 11 March 2021.
All research outputs
#15,670,023
of 23,285,523 outputs
Outputs from International Journal of General Medicine
#661
of 1,484 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#259,054
of 418,086 outputs
Outputs of similar age from International Journal of General Medicine
#31
of 71 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,285,523 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,484 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 9.1. This one is in the 40th percentile – i.e., 40% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 418,086 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 28th percentile – i.e., 28% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 71 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 45th percentile – i.e., 45% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.