Title |
Efficacy of rFVIIIFc versus Emicizumab for the Treatment of Patients with Hemophilia A without Inhibitors: Matching-Adjusted Indirect Comparison of A-LONG and HAVEN Trials
|
---|---|
Published in |
Journal of Blood Medicine, February 2021
|
DOI | 10.2147/jbm.s288283 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Robert Klamroth, Piotr Wojciechowski, Samuel Aballéa, Françoise Diamand, Zalmai Hakimi, Jameel Nazir, Lydia Abad-Franch, Stefan Lethagen, Elena Santagostino, Michael D Tarantino |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 14 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United Kingdom | 2 | 14% |
Slovenia | 1 | 7% |
Mexico | 1 | 7% |
Spain | 1 | 7% |
United States | 1 | 7% |
Unknown | 8 | 57% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 11 | 79% |
Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 7% |
Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 7% |
Scientists | 1 | 7% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 18 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 18 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Bachelor | 3 | 17% |
Other | 2 | 11% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 2 | 11% |
Researcher | 2 | 11% |
Student > Master | 1 | 6% |
Other | 0 | 0% |
Unknown | 8 | 44% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 7 | 39% |
Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine | 1 | 6% |
Immunology and Microbiology | 1 | 6% |
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 1 | 6% |
Unknown | 8 | 44% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 74. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 26 March 2021.
All research outputs
#541,994
of 24,353,295 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Blood Medicine
#10
of 314 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#16,115
of 514,204 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Blood Medicine
#2
of 11 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,353,295 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 97th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 314 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 9.9. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 514,204 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 11 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its contemporaries.