↓ Skip to main content

Dove Medical Press

Societal savings in patients with advanced non-squamous non-small-cell lung cancer receiving bevacizumab-based versus non-bevacizumab-based treatments in France, Germany, Italy, and Spain

Overview of attention for article published in ClinicoEconomics and Outcomes Research: CEOR, October 2012
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (60th percentile)

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source

Citations

dimensions_citation
6 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
26 Mendeley
Title
Societal savings in patients with advanced non-squamous non-small-cell lung cancer receiving bevacizumab-based versus non-bevacizumab-based treatments in France, Germany, Italy, and Spain
Published in
ClinicoEconomics and Outcomes Research: CEOR, October 2012
DOI 10.2147/ceor.s34188
Pubmed ID
Authors

Johanna Lister, Sanja Stanisic, Klaus Kaier, Christian Hagist, Dmitry Gultyaev, Stefan Walzer

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to investigate the savings accrued using bevacizumab-based treatment for non-small-cell lung cancer from the societal perspective, taking only public costs into account, in France, Germany, Italy, and Spain.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 26 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 26 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 7 27%
Student > Bachelor 5 19%
Student > Ph. D. Student 3 12%
Other 2 8%
Student > Doctoral Student 1 4%
Other 5 19%
Unknown 3 12%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 10 38%
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 5 19%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 2 8%
Psychology 2 8%
Unspecified 1 4%
Other 3 12%
Unknown 3 12%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 03 April 2019.
All research outputs
#8,571,053
of 25,457,858 outputs
Outputs from ClinicoEconomics and Outcomes Research: CEOR
#202
of 525 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#65,320
of 191,151 outputs
Outputs of similar age from ClinicoEconomics and Outcomes Research: CEOR
#3
of 10 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,457,858 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 525 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 12.0. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 52% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 191,151 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 10 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 7 of them.